Skip Navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser.

This website may not display properly with Internet Explorer. For the best experience, please use a more recent browser such as the latest versions of Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and/or Mozilla Firefox. Thank you.

Your Environment. Your Health.

Strategic Planning

Superfund Research Program

2015-2020 Strategic Plan

In 2015, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Hazardous Substance Research and Training Program (Superfund Research Program or SRP) engaged stakeholders from academia, environmental health agencies, and not-for-profit organizations to review and refine, as needed, the SRP 2010 Strategic Plan. The resulting 2015 document reaffirms SRP's commitment to the objectives presented in the 2010 Strategic Plan. The refinements presented in this document strengthen the Program's approach to improving human health and the environment through reducing or eliminating the negative impacts of exposure to hazardous substances from hazardous waste sites.

2010-2015 Strategic Plan

In response to recommendations from the SRP 2009 External Advisory Panel, the Program developed a strategic plan to provide direction to achieve its mandates described in SARA Section 311(a).

External Advisory Panels

The SRP convenes External Advisory Panels to review the performance of the Program and ensure that the Program remains responsive to its mandates. Panels are made up of members of academia, government, and industry, and represent Program stakeholders in their assessments.

2009 External Advisory Panel

The 2009 External Advisory Panel (EAP) report and executive summary provided the following recommendations:

  1. Identify and promote research on emerging scientific issues critical for site assessment and remediation.
  2. Increase program integration and promote interactions among grantees.
  3. Increase emphasis on translation of research towards remediation activities.
  4. Promote effective and sensitive community outreach.
  5. Ensure critical review of continuously-funded, multi-project grants.
  6. Develop and/or improve tools for assessing progress and achievements.
  7. Develop metrics to assess the impact of SBRP research.

2003 External Advisory Panel

In 2003, the SRP challenged the working group to identify strengths and areas of productivity of the Program, to determine the adequacy of the Program’s efforts to communicate the science emanating from the Program, as well as to provide insights to future directions.

In the summary report, the EAP recommended that the SRP continue to integrate the science beyond the multidisciplinary structure currently in place and reinforced the SRP staff’s philosophy that research results must be made readily accessible to program stakeholders, and technology transfer should be pursued on a formal and active basis.

Back
to Top