Skip Navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Your Environment. Your Health.

Healthy homes: in-home environmental asthma intervention in a diverse urban community

Environmental Health Economic Analysis Annotated Bibliography

Details

Research article Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
Authors
Turcotte DA, Alker H, Chaves E, Gore R, and Woskie S
Journal
Am J Public Health
Summary
This cost-benefit analysis demonstrated that implementing an in-home environmental asthma intervention for the Lowell, Massachusetts community resulted in a significant health improvement from baseline to follow-up. The cost of the interventions (not including personnel) was $36,240, whereas the estimated savings due to reductions in asthma-related hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and doctor visits over a 4-week assessment period was $71,162, resulting in an estimated annual savings of about $821,304. The authors concluded that low-cost, multicomponent interventions decrease all measures of asthma severity and health care utilization in this diverse population of urban children.
Population
Children with asthma (< 15 years)

Health Outcomes

  • Respiratory outcomes (asthma attacks, wheeze, rhinitis, eczema, cough, phlegm)

Environmental Agents

List of Environmental Agents:

  • Air pollutants (tobacco smoke)
  • environmental asthma triggers, such as pests (roaches and mice), mold, dust mites, furry pets, outdoor allergens

Source of Environmental Agents:

  • Allergens from pests (roaches and mice), combustion sources, moisture, dust, pets

Economic Evaluation / Methods and Source

Type:

  • Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)

Cost Measured:

  • Cost of the in-home intervention

Potential Cost Measures: (Not available)

Benefits Measures:

  • Savings resulting from reductions in hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and doctor visits

Potential Benefits: (Not available)

Location:

  • Lowell, Massachusetts

Models Used: (Not available)

Methods Used:

  • The authors evaluated health care cost savings resulting from individualized interventions focused on reducing indoor allergen levels and asthma triggers. The authors — 1) used a questionnaire tool to conduct a pre-intervention health assessment; 2) used a questionnaire and collected floor dust samples to conduct pre-intervention environmental assessment; 3) implemented customized home and education intervention; 4) followed-up 11 to 12 months post-intervention to evaluate impact of the intervention on the child’s health; 5) determined reduction in urgent care costs resulting from intervention; 6) analyzed change in medication use pre- and post-intervention using a test of proportion.

Sources Used:

  • Data on costs of asthma-related hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and doctor visits from Massachusetts Department of Public Health; Massachusetts Emergency Department Discharge Database (2012)

Economic Evaluation / Methods and Source

Citation:

  • Turcotte DA, Alker H, Chaves E, Gore R, and Woskie S. 2014. Healthy homes: in-home environmental asthma intervention in a diverse urban community. Am J Public Health.

Pubmed:

DOI:

NIEHS Funding: (Not available)

Other Funding:

  • US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control (grant MALHH0171-8)
Back
to Top