Skip Navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.


The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Your Environment. Your Health.

Particulate pollution and the productivity of pear packers

Environmental Health Economic Analysis Annotated Bibliography


Research article Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
Chang T, Graff Zivin J, Gross T and Neidell M
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
This analysis examined the effect of outdoor air pollution on the productivity of indoor workers at a pear-packing factory in Northern California. A 10-unit increase in PM2.5 reduced worker productivity by approximately 6 percent; these effects occurred at PM levels below national air quality standards. In a nationwide extrapolation, reductions in PM2.5 between 1999 and 2008 generated $19.5 billion in labor cost savings. Findings suggest that outdoor pollution affects the labor productivity of indoor workers, and may be an important determinant of economic growth.
Employees in a pear-packing facility

Health Outcomes

  • Not available

Environmental Agents

List of Environmental Agents:

  • Air pollutants (particulate matter (PM2.5/fine and PM10/coarse), ozone (O3), carbon monoxide(CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2))

Source of Environmental Agents: (Not available)

Economic Evaluation / Methods and Source


  • Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)

Cost Measured:

  • Reduced earnings due to presenteeism (reduced on-the-job productivity)

Potential Cost Measures:

  • Changes in labor supply due to air pollution related sickness (e.g., missed work days, shortened work hours)

Benefits Measures:

  • Labor productivity benefits
  • total welfare benefits (captured by capitalization into housing prices)

Potential Benefits: (Not available)


  • Northern California

Models Used: (Not available)

Methods Used:

  • The authors estimated the effects of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on worker productivity in a pear-packing facility. The authors — 1) estimated hourly productivity using a hybrid production function which accounted for variable and fixed effects; 2) applied estimated effects to calculate productivity in the manufacturing sector at a national level from changes in PM2.5 across the U.S. from 1999-2008; and 3) quantified total welfare benefits associated with this pollution reduction by using the hedonic price method to study the effect of PM2.5 on housing values.

Sources Used:

  • Worker productivity data from payroll records provided by the pear-packing facility for the 2001, 2002, and part of the 2003 packing seasons; weather and pollution data from monitors maintained by the California Air Resources Board; county-level manufacturing earnings data from Bureau of Labor Statistics (2000); additional sources cited in publication

Economic Evaluation / Methods and Source


  • Chang T, Graff Zivin J, Gross T and Neidell M. 2016. Particulate pollution and the productivity of pear packers. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.
  • Pubmed
  • DOI

NIEHS Funding:

  • 1R21ES019670-01

Other Funding:

  • The George and Obie Shultz Fund
to Top