Environmental Health Economic Analysis Annotated Bibliography
Go BackDetails
Research articleAuthors
Brethour C and Weersink A
Journal
Agricultural Economics
Summary
This study examined the environmental benefits of pesticide risk reduction in Ontario, Canada, and determined that the reduction in external costs associated with changes in pesticide use between 1983 and 1998 was $188 per household and $711 million (in US dollars) for the province as a whole. These benefits were largely due to the reduction in the levels of high and moderate-risk pesticides.
Population
Not available
Health Outcomes
Health Outcome List:
- Not available
Environmental Agents
List of Environmental Agents:
- Pesticides
Source of Environmental Agents:
- Application of agricultural pesticides
Economic Evaluation / Methods and Source
Type:
- Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
Cost Measures:
- External costs of pesticide use (low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk)
Potential Cost Measures:
- Not available
Benefits Measures:
- Willingness to pay values for reduction in environmental risk incurred by pesticide uses
- values of the changes in environmental risks posed by pesticides
Potential Benefits Measures:
- Not available
Location:
- Ontario, Canada
Models Used:
- Not available
Models References:
- Not available
Methods Used:
- The authors evaluated the value of environmental benefits associated with changes in the levels and types of pesticides applied in Ontario agriculture. They used the physical risk assessment approach (Mullen et al. 1997) with an incorporated contingent valuation survey to determine consumers' willingness to pay (CWP) for reductions in pesticide risk to different components of the environment. Using this approach, the authors — 1) identified changes in pesticide risk to the environment; and 2) examined valuation of changes in environmental risk using previous estimates of respondents willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce risk within each environmental category.
Sources Used:
- Survey data from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs; additional sources cited in publication
Economic Citation / Fundings
Citation:
- Brethour C and Weersink A. An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction. Agricultural Economics. 2001. 25.
- DOI
NIEHS Funding:
- Not available
Other Funding: Not available