Environmental Health Economic Analysis Annotated Bibliography
Go BackDetails
Research articleAuthors
Wong EY, Gohlke J, Griffith WC, Farrow S, and Faustman EM
Journal
Environmental Health Perspectives
Summary
This study estimated that the inclusion of child-specific data on hospitalizations, emergency department visits, school absences and low birth weight would add $1-2 billion to the predicted cost estimates of decreased morbidity and mortality derived from the US Clean Air Act (CAA). The results highlighted the need for environmental health policy analyses to include improved information for children's health effects.
Population
Children and adolescents (≤ 18 years)
Health Outcomes
- Mortality, Respiratory outcomes, Birth outcomes
Health Outcome List:
- Mortality (post-neonatal mortality)
- respiratory outcomes (asthma, upper respiratory symptoms, lower respiratory symptoms, shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheeze, acute bronchitis)
- birth outcomes (low birth weight, birth defects (ventricular septal defect))
Environmental Agents
List of Environmental Agents:
- Air Pollutants (ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5))
Source of Environmental Agents:
- Not available
Economic Evaluation / Methods and Source
Type:
- Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
Cost Measures:
- Hospital admissions and emergency department visits
Potential Cost Measures:
- Pain and suffering
- lost leisure time
Benefits Measures:
- Reduced cases of post-neonatal mortality
- reduced number of asthma hospitalizations, emergency department visits
- avoided school absences
- reduced number of low birth weight infants
Potential Benefits Measures:
- Benefits of reduced birth defects (e.g., cardiac defects)
Location:
- Not available
Models Used:
- Fast Environmental Regulatory Evaluation Tool (FERET)
Models References:
- http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-Bk-improving-reg-ch19.pdf
Methods Used:
- The authors utilized a meta-analysis approach to assess child-specific health impacts derived from the US Clean Air Act (CAA). The authors — 1) surveyed the peer-reviewed air pollution literature for studies focused exclusively on children or presenting results for children ≤ 18 years of age in the US; 2) included 23 original studies examining the association between a considered health effect and an air pollutant; 3) used estimated expected average changes in annual air pollutant concentrations for the entire US on a national level through 2010 based on a previous analysis of the US EPA 1990 - 2010 study (Farrow et al. 2001) to allow comparability with previous studies; 4) estimated a projected 2010 US population ≤ 18 years old; and 5) analyzed health impacts using regression coefficients from different studies of the same health outcome that were combined to form a regression coefficient specific to each end point and pollutant.
Sources Used:
- International Classification of Diseases (US DHHS 1991); US Census Bureau (2002); additional sources cited in publication
Economic Citation / Fundings
Citation:
- Wong EY, Gohlke J, Griffith WC, Farrow S, and Faustman EM. Assessing the health benefits of air pollution reduction for children. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2004. 112; 2.
- Pubmed
- DOI
NIEHS Funding:
- 1P01ES09601
Other Funding: Not available