Predictive toxicology faculty rallies around new directions
By Eddy Ball
The Predictive Toxicology and Disease (PT&D) faculty meeting June 2 attracted some fifty scientists from across the three research divisions at NIEHS. The meeting provided historical perspective on the PT&D initiative and activity updates, and solicited ideas from the audience for implementing the Institute’s 2012-2017 strategic plan.
PT&D is one of eight crosscutting themes in the strategic plan. The faculty concept is an effort to marshal resources developed in the various labs, sections, and groups where science is being conducted, into a unified effort.
“The implementation teams were the obvious next step for the strategic plan,” said NIEHS planning and policy lead Sheila Newton, Ph.D., in her opening talk on historical perspective. Since the themes are ones that all the divisions independently identified as priorities, she continued, “[Leaders proposed] we should have the planning process be one that involves all of the divisions working together, rather than [having each division] independently come up with a plan.”
Representatives of the three divisions — the Division of Intramural Research (DIR), Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT), and Division of the National Toxicology Program (DNTP) — took turns at the podium, describing their respective programs and resources, in a demonstration of the kind of proactive communication the faculty concept is working to inspire. As speakers shared the details of their predictive toxicology and disease programs, they also attempted to identify intersections among their divisions’ efforts.
DNTP Tox21(613KB) lead and Biomedical Screening Branch (BSB) head Raymond Tice, Ph.D., helped set the tone with his report on the federal partner consortium formed in 2008 to address the development of next-generation high-throughput toxicology testing for thousands of chemicals. Colleague Stephen Ferguson, Ph.D., joined in to discuss progress in Phase III of the Tox21 program now underway.
“We’re actively seeking the opportunity for cross-division collaborations,” Tice told the group, “and one of the purposes of the faculty is to provide a forum for the free exchange of information.”
In her report, DERT) representative Claudia Thompson, Ph.D., briefly discussed a database that coded all the epidemiology projects supported by NIEHS. She said the database could be used as a resource to identify potential sources of biological samples, to address questions of concern for the PT&D initiative.
DIR toxicogenomics veteran Richard Paules, Ph.D., described a leadership-sponsored, cross-division effort to develop a high-throughput transcriptome platform using approximately 1,500 genes that could be used to greatly expand our understanding of the relationship between chemicals, genes, pathways, and disease.
DERT program lead Daniel Shaughnessy, Ph.D., offered a preview of the stem cell development meeting June 3-4 and its significance for PT&D implementation efforts.
DERT representative Kimberly McAllister, Ph.D., pointed to an upcoming workshop on collaborative cross and diversity outbred mice models.
Warren Casey, Ph.D., director of the NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), reviewed his group’s work in adverse outcome pathway research using in vitro testing, as well as alternative animal models, including zebrafish, and noted the added benefit of an integrated predictive toxicology program, with the reduction of the number of animals used in testing.
Facilitator Elizabeth Maull, Ph.D., of DNTP, closed the meeting with a look at next steps, including a possible PT&D lecture series. By specifically describing itself as a faculty activity, such a series might lure scientists away from their silos of specialization and into the broader arena of communication, and help people perceive, more acutely, activities across the divisions.