skip navigation
Environmental Factor, December 2013

/
Whole Issue PDF
This issue's PDF is still being created and should be available 3-5 business days after the first of the month. Please check back in a few days.

Toxicology symposium highlights the flip sides of nanomaterials

By Sheila Yong

ITEHP symposium

The ITEHP symposium attracted participants from Duke, as well as other universities and research institutes in the Triangle, including NIEHS and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)

Andre Nel, M.D., Ph.D.

Nel, an NIEHS grantee through the NanoHealth and Safety program, started off the day’s program with his talk on nanomaterials and human health. “Many properties of nanomaterials are actually detrimental to the cells, such as their ability to produce reactive oxygen species and cause chronic toxicity,” he explained. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)

In the midst of Halloween spirit, attendees of the Duke University Integrated Toxicology and Environmental Health Program (ITEHP) (http://sites.nicholas.duke.edu/envhealth/)  symposium, which is cofunded by NIEHS, gathered to hear the latest findings on the consequences of exposure to nanomaterials in the environment. Held at the Sarah P. Duke Gardens Oct. 31, the symposium was moderated by Mark Wiesner, Ph.D., and Richard Di Giulio, Ph.D.

Wiesner is the director of Duke’s National Science Foundation-funded Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT), (http://ceint.duke.edu/)  which partners with the NIEHS-funded Duke University Superfund Research Program. Di Giulio is the director of ITEHP.

This year’s symposium, “Rapidly Emerging Nanomaterials: Insuring Human and Environmental Health,” featured presentations on nanomaterial synthesis and properties, as well as the effects of nanomaterial use on living organisms and the ecosystem. “The topic today is scary,” said Wiesner, as he welcomed the attendees. It was scary indeed, as speakers showcased their findings on how nanomaterial use might negatively impact the environment and well-being of humans and other organisms.

Nanomaterials are beneficial, or are they really?

Talks by Andre Nel, Jamie Lead, and Kam Leong focused on the use of different types of nanomaterials in various applications, and the effects their properties may have on living cells and tissues. Nel pointed out that many of these characteristics actually do more harm than good. He urged the use of high throughput screening of nanomaterials to characterize their risks and predict exposure outcomes, which could be helpful in regulating nanomaterial synthesis and use.

Lead discussed how nanomaterials of various sizes and properties behave in different solutions, such as those found in various environmental and biological systems. He explained that the stability of nanomaterials depends on what they are made of, and the coating used can also affect their characteristics in solution. Acknowledging Nel’s comment on nanomaterial screening, Lead said, “There needs to be a balance between the science and regulation.”

Kam Leong’s talk brought the audience back to the benefits of nanomaterial use. His research focuses on using nanotechnology to create a safe and cost-efficient gene delivery method to treat hemophilia, a bleeding disorder that slows down the blood clotting process.

Nanomaterials in the ecosystem

In the lab, scientists often use reagents at levels far beyond the normal range encountered in the environment. Emily Bernhardt  emphasized, however, that nanomaterials could still create havoc in the ecosystem even at extremely low concentrations.

Amy Ringwood agreed with Bernhardt’s view. “Instead of waiting for the consequences to occur, can we be proactive for a change?” she asked. Using oysters as her model, Ringwood found that filter feeders, who obtain food by filtering particles from water, could ingest and excrete agglomerated, or clustered, nanoparticles, leading to resuspension and reexposure. Therefore, once in the ecosystem, nanoparticles never go away.

Nanomaterial effects at the cellular and organismal levels

Former NIEHS trainees Tara Sabo-Attwood, Joel Meyer, and James Bonner discussed the effects of nanoparticle exposure on cells and living organisms. Meyer and Bonner are also NIEHS grantees.

Sabo-Attwood and Bonner study nanoparticle exposure effects on the respiratory system. Explaining that many nanoparticles are airborne and may cause respiratory diseases, Sabo-Attwood showed that lung epithelial cells exposed to nanotubes are more susceptible to influenza virus infection, suggesting that nanotube exposure may alter host immunity. “We plan to use animal models to determine the mechanism of infection and if there is any nanoparticle-specific effect,” she added.

Bonner studies the health risks associated with occupational and environmental exposure to carbon nanotubes. He showed that mice that inhaled carbon nanotubes developed air way and lung irritation, which often precedes respiratory diseases, such as asthma and mesothelioma.

Meyer found that nanoparticles cause lysosomal toxicity in the nematode C. elegans, identifying mutants that are sensitive to toxicity from dissolved metals and nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress. Interestingly, some of these toxic effects are nanoparticle-specific, and are more prominent in certain genetic backgrounds. “The interesting question is how we can incorporate the genetic variability among the population into the toxicological assessment of nanoparticles,” he said.

(Sheila Yong, Ph.D., is a visiting fellow in the NIEHS Laboratory of Signal Transduction.)


Di Giulio and Meyer

Di Giulio introduced Meyer, right, while he was getting slides ready for his presentation. Meyer, now an assistant professor of environmental toxicology at Duke, obtained his Ph.D. from Di Giulio’s lab. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)


Amy Ringwood, Ph.D.

Ringwood introduced the audience to the hepatopancreatic cells that make up the oysters’ gut. She explained that the gut of filter feeders is the first to encounter any pollutant or toxin in the environment. She showed that nanoparticles enter the oysters and accumulate in the lysosomes, which are intracellular vesicles containing degradative enzymes. This response results in lysosomal disruption and reduction of embryonic viability. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)


James Bonner, Ph.D.

Bonner studies the potential of nanoparticles to cause lung disease. “There are no human diseases identified so far, but susceptible individuals will be affected first,” he said. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)


Tara Sabo-Attwood, Ph.D.

Sabo-Attwood responded to questions from the audience after her presentation. Her group at the University of Florida studies the effects of nanoparticle exposure on pathogenic infection. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)


Emily Bernhardt, Ph.D.

Bernhardt showed that aquatic wetland plants die when exposed to silver nanoparticles in the water. “Their roots dissolved, and the plants spilled their guts out,” she said. These phenomena eventually result in increased levels of nanoparticle aggregates and greenhouse gases in the environment. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)


Mark Wiesner, Ph.D.

Besides giving the welcome speech, Wiesner also served as an emcee for the symposium and introduced several of the speakers before their presentations. (Photo courtesy of Steve McCaw)




"Toxicogenetics Challenge winners announced ..." - previous story Previous story Next story next story - "Expert panel concurs with ..."
December 2013 Cover Page

Back to top Back to top