GEMS meeting focuses on preventing and curing cancer
By William Kaufmann and Eddy Ball
The Genetics and Environmental Mutagenesis Society (GEMS) (http://www.gems-nc.org/) held its 31st annual fall meeting Nov. 14 at the Sheraton Imperial Hotel and Convention Center in Research Triangle Park, N.C. The meeting, supported in part by grants from NIEHS, was organized around the theme “Exploiting the DNA damage response to prevent and cure cancer.”
The event was organized and moderated by GEMS President-elect William Kaufmann, Ph.D., (http://unclineberger.org/members/william-k-kaufmann) who opened the meeting on an optimistic note. “We’d all like to find a way we can prevent or cure it [cancer],” he said. “It’s a rather lofty goal, but one we know is attainable.”
“A large fraction of cancers are cured simply by surgery,” he explained. The metastases that escape the surgeon’s knife represent our biggest problem.”
“The other side of it is prevention,” Kaufmann continued. A great part of the challenge is identifying exposures and metabolic processes that can be manipulated to stop cancer before it has a chance to begin.
DNA damage responses: bedside to bench to bedside
Opening the program, Kaufmann introduced Michael Kastan, M.D., Ph.D., (http://pharmacology.mc.duke.edu/faculty/kastan.html) of Duke University, who described his work to translate discoveries about TP53 and ATM to more effective treatments for cancer. He introduced an important new role of nucleolin in nucleosomal remodeling in support of repair of DNA double-strand breaks, and described the application of inhibitors or activators of p53 and ATM signaling to enhance therapy for cancer.
Pathways of DNA repair, and DNA damage checkpoints, protect against development of cancer, by reducing the levels of DNA damage or enhancing the time available for repair of the damage. These DNA damage responses not only protect against the development of cancer, but also protect cancer cells from radiation and chemotherapies that seek to cure the disease. The demonstration of synthetic lethalities, where a weakly toxic insult can be transformed into a highly toxic lesion by modification of gene expression, has renewed interest in the DNA damage response. Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase have modest toxicity normally but, in cells with inactivation of BRCA1-dependent homologous recombination, these drugs have massive toxicity. New combinations of drugs to kill cancer cells with greater specificity are being developed.
Potentiating Top1 poisons by modulating the DNA damage response
The meeting’s second speaker, William Gmeiner, Ph.D., (http://www.wakehealth.edu/faculty/Gmeiner-William-Henry.htm) of Wake Forest School of Medicine, described his efforts to make 5-fluorouracil a more effective chemotherapeutic drug, by creating polymers of the drug with longer lasting bioavailability. The improved polymers produce DNA lesions that bind DNA topoisomerase I (Top1) for enhanced cell killing, and are now being tested for more effective treatment of leukemia and lymphoma.
A remarkable discovery in the field of environmental carcinogenesis was the demonstration that the XPA nucleotide excision repair (NER) factor varied in its expression according to the time of day. Circadian regulation of NER in skin implies that human risk of skin cancer may vary with the time of harmful UV exposure. Circadian regulation of NER may also influence the efficacy of chemotherapies, and this implies that the timing of treatment — and standard of care — may need to be modified.
Control of DNA repair and cancer by the circadian clock
The final speaker of the day, Aziz Sancar, M.D., Ph.D., (http://www.med.unc.edu/biochem/asancar) of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), reported on his efforts to define the role of the circadian clock in environmental carcinogenesis, and how clock mechanisms may be exploited to prevent or cure cancer.
Importantly, mice treated with UV, at a time of day when skin DNA repair was high and DNA replication was low, developed one-fifth as many skin cancers as mice treated twelve hours later, when DNA repair was low and DNA replication was high. Susceptibility to skin carcinogenesis varies according to the time of day in mice, and studies are underway to determine whether human skin also displays circadian variation in risk of UV carcinogenesis.
(William Kaufmann, Ph.D., is a professor in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and a member of the Cancer Genetics Program at UNC.)